Skip to content

Newton and the layperson

November 27, 2012

Newton’s notion of BODY (existing in-and-of itself) is [in a sense] an acknowledgment and a further assertion of layman’s understanding of body: yours, mine, etc.  This is not to suggest anything along the lines of brilliance (Laws of Motion) follows science building on the things we understand and definitely not to say science gone fishin when it goes on fishing expeditions.

There’s not much choice: just DO, with DESCRIBE as a part of doing.

I can read a book.  So book is an entity that can be read.  Did anything happen to the book as a result of reading?  Looks happy.  So this entity can be characterized in terms of what operations can be performed on it and in terms of the (emotional) terminology employed to describe its properties (looks) in the context of reading (operation).

Do something more definite?

If you give me a piece of string, then I can align the two endpoints and hold them together with my thumb and forefinger letting free fall of the string in between and after some more words like these I have two strings of the same length and this length (description) is determined by equations involving the definite deeds performed.

I am sorry it doesn’t go all the way:

Geometry is a form of algebra.

Conceptual Mathematics, page 378

About these ads
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,200 other followers

%d bloggers like this: