Climbing a ladder called
The Connected Components Functor
You start at a.
You climb 2 stairs (α).
You reach α2a.
I start at b.
I climb 1 stair.
I reach αb.
I see you on the same stair i.e.
α2a = αb
It starts at c.
It climbs 1 stair.
It reaches αc.
I can’t sit still on αb; I’m like a monkey whose tail has been set on fire.
I start at b.
I climb 2 stairs.
I reach α2b.
I see It on the same stair i.e.
α2b = αc
You, upon watching me run around like a headless chicken (which is what my good Mexican friend Alicia says) being with you at times and with It at other times, begin to wonder how many steps you have to climb up from your a to be with It. After some action potentials you realize that you can also be with It if the stair you reach after climbing some n stairs from your a is same as the stair that It reaches after climbing some m stairs from its c i.e. if
αna = αmc
(Please see the internal diagram on top of page 183 of Conceptual Mathematics textbook to see how the ladder we are climbing now looks like.)
So you go looking for the above numbers (n, m) in what you have seen
α2a = αb
α2b = αc
Since I climbed 2 steps to get to be with It, you climb 1 more step with me from where we (you & I) met i.e.
α2a = αb
α (α2a) = α (αb)
α3a = α2b
α3a = αc (since α2b = αc)
So if you climb 3 stairs from a you will be with It which got there after climbing 1 stair from c.
Meeting-point of You and I
a -> αa -> (α2a = αb)
^
|
b
Meeting-point of I and It
(α2b = αc) <- c
^
|
αb
^
|
b
Meeting-point of You and It
(α2b = αc) <- c
^
|
a -> αa -> (α2a = αb)
I have a vague feeling that there’s something that’s not quite right with this ‘physical interpretation’ of Exercise 1 (Conceptual Mathematics, page 358):
If
x is connected to y
and
y is connected to z
then
x is connected to z
In other words, if
αpx = αqy
and
αry = αsz
then there exist numbers t, u such that
αtx = αuz
Multiplying both sides of the given equation
αpx = αqy
with αr (from the given αry = αsz)
αr (αpx) = αr (αqy)
α(r + p)x = α(r + q)y
(given the commutativity of addition i.e. r + q = q + r)
= α(q + r)y
= αq (αry)
(given αry = αsz)
= αq (αsz)
α(r + p)x = α(q + s)z
αtx = αuz (with t = r + p, u = q + s)
So we say x, z are connected.
Having said that let me go work on my (aforementioned) feelings!
I wish I understood as much mathematics as you do, but what I do understand ~your writing intrigues and opens a world to me! You’re ingenious ! Sincerely Deborah
Thanks Deborah for your touching note! Yours, posina